3rd Dec, 2007

“KEEPING A LID ON IT” – The constant need to control the size and scope of government.

ConstitutionIf “We the People” do not wisely and consistently control the size and scope of our government, it will surely control us in ways never intended when such power was first delegated to it. Over time, the lines between local, state and federal governments have become so blurred that we can scarcely tell where one begins and another ends. And yet, one taxpayer can only handle so much. There is a finite limit to how much can be piled on.

Stop and think of everyone who has your checkbook and your credit card – Washington D.C and your state capitol and all their many departments and administrative entities, the County, the City, the sewer district, the school district and on and on. Each has the power to impose and collect taxes. Then the combined bill ultimately falls on each individual taxpayer with no single taxing entity caring much what the total bill may be. Still, we expect our elected representatives to care and protect us but do they? Clearly, government overlap, waste, duplicity and inefficiency steal the just rewards of labor from the laborer. Where is the incentive to work, save, dream and invest when heavy taxes and runaway government spending leave citizens feeling helpless and hopeless?

The blessings of liberty” secured by our Constitution promise better treatment. Of course, it could always be worse. As Will Rogers wryly commented: “It’s a good thing we don’t get all the government we pay for.” Even so, citizens who work together and push for principled government never let go of the ideal. We continually strive for what was intended and what is right and not merely what has evolved.

Consider the wisdom of Thomas Jefferson who astutely described the narrow focus of national, state, county and city governments and the residual power reserved by the people themselves.

The way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one; but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent to. Let the National government be entrusted with the defence of the nation, and its foreign & federal relations; the State governments with the civil rights, laws, police and administration of what concerns the state generally; the Counties with the local concerns of the counties, and each Ward [city or town] direct the interests within itself. It is by dividing and subdividing these republics from the great National one down thro’ all its subordinations, until it ends in the administration of every man’s farm and affairs by himself; by placing under one what his own eye may superintend, that all will be done for the best.”

If we do not control our government and hold it accountable directly to the people at every level, the voice of restraint will be nothing more than a hollow cry in a wilderness of indifference. That must never be.

The media recently reported the degree to which Utah and other states receive more in Federal funds than what their citizen’s pay in federal taxes. It was described as “getting more bang for our buck” on the assumption we have all accepted the liberal premise of using taxes to “redistribute wealth.” I trust we have not. If the goal is to selfishly work the system and reward those politicians who “bring home the pork”, we are far far away from what America truly believes and represents. Otherwise, why not simply raise taxes through the roof and work the spread. Obviously, that is not what we want but that is where the principle leads if we allow the status quo to continue unchecked.

“What the eye may superintend,” said Jefferson. Can the federal government see and understand a classroom or a small business in Utah? Hardly, but that does not slow them down or keep them from imposing a sea of regulation and unfunded mandates. How goes the “administration of every man’s farm and affairs by himself?” Not well because he is not allowed to do it himself. Ronald Reagan stirred the hope of a better way when he spoke of making government work – “work with us, not over us, stand by our side, not ride on our back.” He also said, “Government is the people’s business, and every man, woman and child becomes a stakeholder with the first penny of tax paid.” When we think and act like “stakeholders” and not as “mere passengers” – principled government takes over and politics must step aside.



Responses

I’m thrilled to see this web site. Congratulations on it’s initiation! I’m looking forward to reviewing your blogs and exchanging thoughts. As always, stay close to the principles that made this country great! Best of success to you and your new site!

So far so good. I am always interested in principles being applied in government. your cover artlicle has me a bit concerned though.

What exactly do you classify as “accomplishment” of a governmental official? If an elected official heads to the US Senate with the understanding that he should “accomplish something” isn’t that giving him incentive to create job security for himself? Isn’t that the source of all the “government overlap, waste, duplicity and inefficiency?”

In my mind, the best thing any elected official can do is strive to put himself out of a job, working to make it so that he is not needed full time, thus giving a disincentive to career politicians and political parties whose main purpose is to obtain and hold an office, rather than serve the people who elect them.

Ammon

Thank you for your comments. I certainly didn’t intend to suggest that “accomplishment” by an elected official requires or is measured by whether they expanded or added to the status quo. Just the opposite – as you mentioned, a most significant “accomplishment” would be to successfully discern and reverse unnecessary ongoing expense and government regulation. (Please see my “blog” on reducing government – “Keeping a Lid on It”). While serving in the State Legislature and observing what is done in Washington, I have often thought that perhaps we should pass a law that requires our elected representatives to repeal two old laws before they can pass one new law. I say that in jest but what you have described fits within my intended meaning of “accomplishment”. I watch for and support elected officials who have that perspective and commitment. That is why we oppose unneeded “pork” in the Federal budget in the form of unfounded “earmarks” that are added each year by individual members of Congress (often anonymously).

I once heard a Presidential Candidate tell young people that he hoped they would consider politics as a “wonderful career”. I cringed because it is “public service” and was never intended to be “a career”. The Founders sacrificed much and pledged their “lives, fortunes and sacred honor” to establish our nation. Washington and Jefferson, for example, longed for the day when they could return (without elaborate public pensions, etc.) to their private life. How do today’s fulltime elected members of Congress sometimes retire with greater personal wealth than when they began their service? Sadly, Congress has established and perpetuated such a “seniority system” that it now fosters career politicians who are increasingly out of touch with everyday life in America. You might want to read “Restoration” by columnist George Will. He makes a very compelling case for Congressional term limits for the very reasons that you have mentioned.

I trust that these thoughts are responsive to the concerns that you raised. Thank you so much for your insights and sharing your thoughts with me.

Robert Welch once said, “We need pullers at the oars, not riders in the boat.”

I think this is appropriate to your quote of Teddy Roosevelt. Too many of us are and have been content to enjoy the fruits of so much labor and sacrifice, as if we had a right to so many amazing blessings without any effort on our own part.

Thank you Dave. You and Laurel are great examples of “pullers at the oars”. Thank you for your diligence in spreading these principles and the spirit of informed ancd active citizenship these many years.

Leave a response

Your response: